Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 24

< June 23	June 25 >

June 24

File:ForeclosureRescueAd.jpg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 July 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Seems to me this would have been deletable under WP:CSD#G10 when first nominated at WP:PUF. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures use in Foreclosure rescue scheme is implying wrongdoing by the company named on the sign, a picture of the sign is of no encyclopaedic value. Mtking (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was already deleted once; wouldn't this qualify for G4? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This sign was placed on public property. I took this picture while on public property. Under US law, this is a constitutional right. The law also defines the sign as being public property while it is on public land. Hellno2 (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is irrelevant where you were when you took the picture, it is of no encyclopaedic value and the use you wish to put it to is implying wrongdoing without showing it. Mtking (talk) 20:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Under the law of the county where I live, the placement of this sign in the location where it is is actually illegal. The company broke local law by placing it there. Hellno2 (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Says who ? Only your word that is the case. Mtking (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The actual legality/illegality of the sign is irrelevant. The fact is that a claim of illegality is being made using Wikipedia as a potential battleground. This opens Wikipedia up to lawsuits and libel/slander claims. Per WP:LIBEL, it should be removed. If you can show through reliable sources that this particular sign is, in fact, illegal, I would support its inclusion. Buffs (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some links about it: [1], [2]. Hellno2 (talk) 23:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't see anything in those that indicates the sign you took a picture of is illegal. You need to show that the sign was illegal (i.e. was in breach of the local law where it was placed) and that the company that is named on the sign authorized it to be in such a place (rather than some with a grudge taking a legally placed sign and moving it so as it becomes illegal). Otherwise it can not be used in the way you wish it to be. Mtking (talk) 04:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These links do indeed tell about the law. The purpose of this picture being in the article is not to slander anyone, but to be an example. Hellno2 (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But not about the sign in the picture, there is nothing to show it was taken in any of the districts named or was in a place covered by those laws, or the company named was doing anything illegal. Mtking (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have to assume good faith here, that if someone says they took a picture in a specific place that they actually did.Hellno2 (talk) 22:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nadine Insatiable music video.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definite fail of WP:NFCC. None free images should only be used where they add significantly to reader understanding, and where their inclusion is detrimental to the understanding and nature of the article. This image is clearly not, adding zero value to the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christina.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC non free images should only be used where they add significantly to reader understanding. Here an isolated frame of Aguilera is shown without sufficient rational for why it is required in the article. Where it is used, it shows no need or requirement for the image. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Community S02E17.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, meaningless FUR, purely decorative use, fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jane & Red John.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Not embedded in analytical commentary, not the object of discussion, meaningless FUR ("to illustrate the article"), purely decorative infobox use, fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't strongly object to this, but the event in the image is discussed in the production section. - Yk³ talk ~ contrib 12:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I'm not big on TV screenshots, but this is a pivotal moment in the series. Every episode of the Mentalist has led to this moment in time. If there's heartburn over it being in the infobox, okay, fine, move it down to later in the article, but it's a rather significant moment. --B (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clint Black in concert 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Commons image File:ClintBlackperforming.jpg --B (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Startshirt1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Test page B (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Syn p1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, looks like a part of a promotional effort for some software awhile back. B (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Syn p2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, looks like a part of a promotional effort for some software awhile back. B (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:600px-Flag of Ireland2.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Ireland, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foi.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flags of Ireland, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:600px-Flag of Ireland3.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Ireland, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ireland5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of a 3D flag of Ireland with no EXIF data, maybe otherwise worth a trip to Commons except it's tiny and the rest of the user's uploads are of highly questionable copyright status, so there's no reason to believe it is actually user-authored. B (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leinster1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Leinster, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irishflag.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, as above a photo of a flying Irish flag. But it's very low-res and given the user's upload history, no reason to believe it was actually user-authored. B (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Connacht.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Connact, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Ulster.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Ulster, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Leinster.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Leinster, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ulster f1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, useless B (talk) 16:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ul1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, purported flag of Ireland, of which this user claims to be the copyright holder. B (talk) 16:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soccerlogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, logo presumably for a non-notable endeavor B (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01359.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentifiable subject Acather96 (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01378.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 16:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:View from Eilean Donan Castle bridge onto Loch Duich.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of person with no encyclopedic use B (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheDizzyKings.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, apparently a logo for a non-notable group B (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:80 FTW.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A redundant image with significantly lower quality than File:80th Flying Training Wing.png. Is orphaned. -- ^Alquery talk 17:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture Backup 047.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possibly a userphoto. Uploader only has three contribs (consisting of two images, both up for deletion) Sven Manguard Wha? 19:15, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alkene.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing structure - most chemists would interpret this at 2-propene, not a generic alkene. Orphaned file as well. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Analgesic group.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly drawn, wrong font, orphaned file. No obvious use. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy G7, but jeez, WP:NPA, alright? I know I made this like four years ago when I wasn't good at Photoshop but it can't be THAT bad. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Asparagine side chain.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, png too small, causing "jaggies" Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wappenmuenchhausen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, a better version is available as File:Wappen Münchhausen (am Christenberg).svg B (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Webers Mill Yarrow Missouri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn --B (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as PD-self, but description is "Postcard of Weber's Mill on the Chariton River, Yarrow, Missouri circa 1920". Depending on exactly how circa 1920 it is, it may be public domain, but we would need more information (in other words, is it pre-1923). B (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Against deletion -- The back was a note from one of my relatives to another and was dated February, 1921 if that helps. Regrettably I no longer have the card (an aunt out of state has it) or I could scan the back and post it for verification. I realize Wikipedia has copyright rules for a good reason, but sometimes it gets taken to a ridiculous level by some editors and admins IMHO. This was a simple little postcard portrait made by a long-dead artist of a long gone mill in a small Missouri town. The chances of someone in 2011 squaking about a copy vio now I'd rate about as likely as Elvis Presley and Bigfoot disembarking from a UFO on the White House lawn! A little common sense seems in order here. I simply thought it was a nice color image to improve the Yarrow article. R anderson1966 (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it's 1921, you need to say "1921", not "circa 1920". Published before 1923 means it's public domain. Make the change and the problem is solved. --B (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I used "circa 1920" assuming that unless the card was printed in Jan.'21 and used in Feb. '21 (doubtful) that it was made/printed/wtf-ever in 1920 or prior. The exact date is unknown other than prior to February, 1921. I have removed the "circa". R anderson1966 (talk) 03:53, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, proclaimed license is questionable (source website says CC-NC) B (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Color Properties.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, cropped from a software screenshot, so arguably has copyright trouble, and we have better images like File:Spectrum.2400.1800.S.G.png that serve the same purpose, are unquestionably free, and not jpeg. B (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better in another format, and the license is dubious (the source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better as an SVG, and the license is dubious (source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better as an SVG, and the license is dubious (source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better as an SVG, and the license is dubious (source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat17.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better as an SVG, and the license is dubious (source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KallSpat2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, would be better as an SVG, and the license is dubious (source website is CC-NC-ND) B (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DichromicAcid.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File. Bad font used - not smooth. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cut The Rope Holiday Gift.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

iOS icon for a variant of the Cut the Rope video game. Fails NFCC8 as not required to understand the article, also no longer used (I've removed it from the article as, er, mere eye candy) Sandstein 20:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Two different photos, the license is referring to the first, and the second (which is presumably Steve Mariotti) is unsourced/unlicensed. B (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pramipexole manc.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, badly drawn Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture J.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZooFari Graphists banner.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal file of mines no longer used. --Zoo Fari 23:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 24

June 24

zproxy.org