Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Buttpunches
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Blank Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 12:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
This user page appears to be a guide to answering an in-store quiz. Wikipedia is not a directory or a how-to guide. TNXMan 01:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Not in mainspace, not spam, no harm, no copyvio. Brand new user. Make contact. Collect (talk) 10:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, pretty clear violation of WP:NOT#WEBHOST, emphasized by the fact that the user describes the page as a "wiki". Stifle (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Delete, definate violation of WP:NOT#WEBHOST, as he is using it as another wiki. Versus22 talk 18:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep User has only been here 2 days, without so much as a welcome (until now). Hasn't even edited mainspace yet - Geesh we're getting a bit bittey aren't we? User should be talked to always before deleting their page - at very worst it should be blanked, not deleted. And personally I don't see a problem with the page, it's nonsense, but so what? — Ched ~ (yes?) 09:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Note One of the reasons I nominated this was because of a similar issue that came up at WP:ANI. Maybe someone can find the specific thread, but their was a minor hullabaloo about someone posting quiz/test answers on Wikipedia. I believe it was an employment or an aptitude test. As Wikipedia is not a web host, I don't think a user page is the place to disseminate that sort of info. TNXMan 11:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Point taken - but I'm still not inclined to change my vote - blank at the very most. Even if s/he had the Devil's 0wn XP listing ... well, on second thought that one should be deleted. But - this one? ... naaa.. talk to the user first. — Ched ~ (yes?) 12:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep/blank This is a new user, it's very likely he/she didn't know the content of the userpage was objectionable. My vote is to air on the side of assuming good faith that he/she will make good contributions to Wikipedia space, and just blank it for now. Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 17:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.